Artists are narcissists.
They just are. I don’t intend to sound critical or judgmental. I include myself
in this statement.
nar·cis·sism [nahr-suh-siz-em] noun
1.
inordinate
fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity. Synonyms: self-centeredness,
smugness, egocentrism.
2.
Psychoanalysis . erotic gratification derived from
admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition
at the infantile level of personality development.
Ugh, maybe I
should take that back. I believe it, but am also hesitant to place such a label
on a pursuit that I believe so wholeheartedly in. I have to say it though. To
make art, you must wholly believe in the lens through which you see the world,
and believe in that perspective’s rightness so completely that you depict that
vision in a way that the world can share it. It is kind of obnoxious. It is
also valuable.
Leaders are
narcissistic. Politicians are narcissistic. Teachers are narcissistic. Athletes
are narcissistic. Doctors, Lawyers, pretty much every role our culture
venerates has a mandatory narcissistic aspect. Artists also just make good
scapegoats. There is no direct altruism inherent in art. Except that whole
recording culture for the understanding of the future thing.
This article highlights that narcissism without stepping back from the individual. I’m not a critic, but I think the role of the critic is to step
back from individual artists and into the big picture and to articulate that big
picture clearly and objectively. Contemporary culture is not unlike this mass
of consumable abstractions and individual cool artist stories. Darlings of the art world are the same as darlings
of politics, of tv, of music. They are the loudest and brightest. They have the
most engaging story. It rarely has to do with what they make.
The work Saltz
highlights in this article was done by the following artists.
Leo Gabin – Collective of 3 Belgian artists who started working
together in 2002
John Bauer – 42 years old, BA from UCSB
Josh Smith – 37 years old from Tennesee
Angel Otero – 32, got his MFA at SAIC at 24, Puerto Rican
Jamie Sneider – SVA MFA 2012, lives in Brooklyn
Rosy Keyser – 39, MFA SAIC
Helene Appel – 37, German
David Ostrowski – 32, studied with Albert
Oehlen
Sergej Jensen – 40, born in Denmark, live in NY
Scott Lyall – 49, MFA Cal Arts
James Krone – 38, Berlin, BFA SAIC
Nick Darmstaedter - 25
Mark Flood – 57, Houston
Israel Lund – 33, MFA PNCA
Parker Ito – 27, Los Angeles
Jay Heikes – 38, Minneapolis, MFA Yale
Oscar Murillo – 27, MFA Royal College of Art 2012
Ryan Sullivan – 31, BFA RISD
Antonia Gurkovska – 30, Chicago and Bulgaria, 2011 MFA SAIC
Gardar Eide Einarsson – 37, Whitney Independent Study program
Nathan Hylden – 35, Los Angeles, MFA Art Center 2006
Louis Eisner – 26, BA Columbia
Joe Bradley – 38, BFA RISD
Charline von Heyl – 54, Brooklyn, contemporary of Laura Owens, Amy
Sillman
Ned Vena – 32, BFA SMFA
Hugh Scott-Douglas – 26, BFA Pratt, OCAD 2010
R.H. Quaytman – 53, father was respected NY artist
Sam Moyer – 31, Brooklyn, MFA Yale 2007
Dan Colen – 35, BFA RISD
Lucien Smith – 25, BFA Cooper Union 2011
Markus Amm – 45, London
Stef Driesen – 48, Belgium
Sam Falls – 30, San Diego
Tauba Auerbach – 33, BA Stanford 2003
David Keating – 36, Berlin
I don’t think Stef Dreisen belongs in this group, but she and Marlene
Dumas could totally be BFFs. It’s funny looking at all of this online. Looking
at their lives and who they might be, because the work mostly looks the same. This
really is quite the educated group. Pretty much the same demographic of ages as
any MFA program 3-4 years later. I say to them the same thing I said in my grad
school crits: Make me care. Show me something interesting.
Something I’m
very interested in, but am still trying to find a way to articulate, is the
line between wealth and money. This painting is important right now because it
is worth a lot of money to collectors. It does not represent wealth, but some
of them are trying.
Somewhere along
the way we as a people forgot where to draw the line. I think part of that has
to do with time. It took Julia Child EIGHT YEARS to make a cookbook that
changed the way the world thinks about cuisine. If we are to make an art that
truly reflects the world, it needs to be more than this. We aren’t giving it
enough time.
No comments:
Post a Comment